People in Athens and elsewhere in Georgia may be familiar with the use of ignition interlocks to deter a repeat DUI offense. Over the years, the use of ignition interlocks has grown but the situations in which ignition interlocks are required in some states has some groups worried that the use is starting to go too far.
Ignition interlocks are designed to stop a car from starting if a driver who blows into the device has had alcohol. Cameras have also been added to the devices in order to prevent drivers from having sober passengers blow into the device. Georgia is among a group of 24 states that use the devices. While Georgia generally requires the device when a driver is convicted of a second DUI, fifteen states require ignition interlocks after a first offense.
Some say the growing trend among states is to mandate ignition interlocks after a driver's first DUI offense. The trend has some groups worried about the fairness of the system. One such group is the American Beverage Institute. The American Beverage Institute is anxious about the use of ignition interlocks and the lack of a judge's ruling in some cases because the trade group wants to draw attention to the distinction between a driver who is slightly over the legal limit and a driver who is way beyond the limit.